Welcome to my
personal professional philosophy of learning and teaching. As an aspiring early
childhood educator I believe good teachers never stop learning, so presenting
my philosophy as a blog allows me to continually add to and reflect upon my
practice throughout the rest of my education career.
As an
aspiring Early Childhood educator, strong values and beliefs are significantly
based upon children’s growth as developmental, whereby a safe and nurturing
environment supports the physical, social, emotional, cognitive and aesthetic
development of the ‘whole’ child. The work of Reggio Emilia greatly influences
this personal professional philosophy, whereby natural development of children and
the close relationships that they share with their environment is fundamental.
Furthermore, the teacher is considered a co-learner and collaborator with
the child, not just an instructor. With this great power, educators can influence
children’s lives through rich learning experiences and foster an environment
which is both demanding and supportive. However, with great power comes even
greater responsibility and in turn making the work of teachers more complex
than ever before. Each day, Early Childhood teachers
face dilemmas whereby legal and ethical dimensions of their work and constant
struggles over schooling
(curriculum, assessment, funding, accountability etc) produce even more
complexities for teachers (Newman & Pollnitz, 2002). Today’s teachers
not only need to be resourceful, adaptable and knowledgeable, but they also
have to be activist professionals, capable of being discerning, imaginative
problem solvers able to deal with constant and relentless social, economic and
technological change (Groundwater-Smith, Ewing & Le Cornu, 2006). The
following philosophy will include personal values, beliefs on early year’s
learning as well as the strong vision I hold as an upcoming Early Childhood
educator.
Image of the Child
With the
belief that “childhood is an adult imposed, socially constructed and culturally
transmitted concept”, Sorin and Galloway, (2006) it is fundamental to have great
understanding of the multiple constructs of children and childhood and consider
how these internal images influence the way we work with young children,
families and communities. It is
fundamental to not hold limited vision of childhood and have full grasp of
multiple understandings of childhood, so as to guide children successfully into
the future without restriction (Sorin and Galloway, 2006). Being aware of
contemporary practice and being able to continually re-conceptualise or rethink
our own views of children and childhood with respect to current theory and
literature is essential. In addition, it is vital that educators respect
children as capable learners and include them in the decision making process
within a guided environment. As today’s image of the child is central to the Reggio
Emilia approach, educators
are required to allow children to voice their opinion on matters that affect
them (UNICEF, 1989). This requires educators to not view the child as a passive
recipient of knowledge, but to partner the child in the curriculum decision
making process (Lancaster, 2006 as cited in VCAA, 2008). As a 21st century educator this understanding of
children will guide future curriculum and decision-making in order to give
children rights, voice, agency, choice and power.
Play Based Learning
Play is the
essence of early childhood. As
acknowledged in a number of early childhood curriculum documents, such as the Early
Years Curriculum Guidelines (QSA, 2006), Building Waterfalls: A Living and
Learning Curriculum Framework (C&K, 2006) and Belonging, Being & Becoming, The Early Years Learning Framework (2010), play is a
central component in young children’s development. Simply stated and highlighted
in the Early Childhood Australian's Code of Ethics (2006), “all Early Childhood
educators accept and honor a child’s right to play as both a practice and
environment for learning, viewing children as capable learners and building an
active environment of engagement and investigation”. With this knowledge that
play is the primary route of learning for young children, it is up to us as
educators to facilitate and encourage play as the central and essential focus
in an early childhood program.
The Role of the Environment
As identified, the Reggio Emilia
approach reflects this philosophy. In much
research it has been said that children learn
best in an environment which allows
them to explore, discover, and play. The organisation of the physical environment
is a core value to the Reggio Emilia approach and is often referred to as the
child’s “third teacher” and therefore as having equal importance as the teacher
(ECA, 2011). A well-designed and
structured environment can support and enhance all areas of children’s
development and learning, just as a poorly planned environment can detract from
overall development and learning (ECA, 2011). The work of Urie Bronfenbrenner
can lend insight into how the environment can teach. In his work examining the
interaction between children and their environments, Bronfenbrenner developed
the concept of bidirectionality, which states that the child impacts the
environment, and is in turn impacted by the environment (Katz, 1987; Ceci, 2006). The
Reggio Emilia Approach’ comprises that environments should be aesthetically
pleasing and therefore must
be included as a vital part of the early childhood curricula.
Diversity and
Prejudice
Difference and diversity defines our society and as a result our
attitudes and level of acceptance of these differences determine the manner in
which we conduct ourselves. By encouraging a raised awareness of diversity, we
are in a more informed position to recognise prejudices and ensure that they do
not narrow our vision. A teachers
attitude towards social inclusion, behaviour, classroom management and the
labelling of students can have a huge impact on the child’s ability to ‘belong’
within his or her school and classroom environment (Hyde, Carpenter, Conway, 2010).
Supporting children with diverse needs,
abilities, disabilities, background, language, gender or socio economic status
and having the confidence to recognise and celebrate these differences is vital
for the Learning Manager to achieve an inclusive learning site. It is important
that the Learning Manager considers personal attitudes and is aware that these
attitudes reflect an acceptance of difference and diversity and are then in
turn modelled to the class (Hyde, Carpenter, Conway, 2010) . Building a healthy
respect and acceptance in the classroom between teacher and students, results
in an enhanced responsibility for the well-being and education development of
the student (Obrien, 2001). Essentially, acceptance of diversity within the
classroom aids educators into successfully implementing a curriculum that is
sensitive to student difference.
Social Capitol
An understanding of children from a sociological, cultural or ecological perspective requires us to acknowledge the diverse characteristics of many aspects of our social contexts, and to consider how these contexts influence the prevailing views or values of our society regarding these issues (especially in relation to children's contexts) (Leonard, 2005). When a child starts school, they bring with them certain 'capitol' acquired by means of family relationships and early experiences. It is the responsibility of the educator to grow this capitol with individualised programs that offer experiences and knowledge to ensure children are able to accumulate and 'spend' this capitol to reach their full potential in life (Leonard, 2005) . It is therefore essential that educators recognise and understand not only the child as an individual but as an integral part of their family and culture in whatever form it takes. Promoting strong relationships with families helps facilitate total understanding of our learners to most effectively assist in their accumulating life long ’capitol’.
Differentiation
To provide a beneficial learning environment and experience for
your students requires an in depth understanding of their individual
diversities. To ‘know your learner’ is to have a knowledge and understanding of
each individuals characteristics, as effective learning and teaching is formed
on the understanding of the learner (The Learning Place, 2011). In a classroom
with diverse ability or disability learners it is fundamental to consider that
all children have a right to high quality education, that every child can learn
and that every teacher learns from their learners (McInerney & McInerney,
2006). Through knowing learners and forming relationships with them, Learning
Managers will have greater understanding of how to manage inclusion in the
classroom.
Teachers Roles
and Responsibilities'
As established, there are many complexities in teacher’s
professional work. Because of social, political and economic change, teachers hold
many roles and responsibilities both inside and outside the classroom. Some of
these roles and responsibilities include effective pedagogy, curriculum and
assessment as well as the importance of strong relationships between all
stakeholders, for example families.
Curriculum
and Pedagogy
Advocating for play based learning programs requires educators to
acknowledge the many curriculum documents and understand the similarities,
differences and the unique visions they hold for young children. Curriculum can
be seen as guide for educators where consideration for the interests and needs
of children are used to create an environment enriched with opportunities and
experiences to explore, discover, problem solve and most of all to learn and
make sense of the world around them (ECA, Successfully implementing curriculum can
often be a difficult task. The responsibility of the educator is to ensure
relevance within the content and procedures of the curriculum for future
lifelong learning for children with varying cultures and interests heading into
a world of globalisation and future issues. Furthermore, with an
ever-increasing culturally and linguistically diverse student body there is
great importance of incorporating a curriculum with critical pedagogical
principles in order to prepare educators for possible harmful practices within
schools and classrooms (Bartolome, 2004). Education is about influence and it
is not objective. Teachers do not simply implement curriculum, but bring their
own knowledge and identities to the construction of a transferable curriculum
with children. The essential part of this involves listening to the children on
matters that concern them in the Early Childhood programme and adapting the
learning environment in response to them so that ‘the children are not shaped
by experience, but are the ones who give shape to it’ (Malaguzzi, 1998 as cited
in Page, 2000).
Digital Clasrrom
Information Communication Technologies (ICT’s) are increasingly
making an appearance in today’s classrooms and schools and much focus has been
concentrated on how good design of physical learning spaces and effective use
of ICT can maximise teaching and learning (DEERW, 2010). Consequently, ICT is
best integrated into general teaching and learning in the classroom rather than
a separate entity (DEERW, 2010). E-learning design should be grounded by sound
theoretical principles and authentic, learner centered pedagogies,
significantly building higher order thinking which is valued by the learner.
ICT’s in the classroom have the capacity to encourage a hands-on interactive
approach to learning and teaching that previously has not been available. This
form of classroom technology is responsible for the change from passive
acquisition of knowledge to active construction of this knowledge in a fun but
structured way (ADB, 2009). An evolving trend in pedagogical development is
evident with online learning tools creating a more collaborative learning
environment than ever before (ADB, 2009). The underlying basis of the
Engagement theory is that students should be meaningfully involved in their
learning through interactive worthwhile tasks which promotes working collaboratively,
project based learning and authenticity (Kearsley & Shneiderman, 1999).
With the knowledge that children of today are digital natives entering into our
ever evolving world, future curriculum decision making is influenced and guided
by the theory that the effective use of ICT’S in the classroom enhance and
transform learning.
Assessment
Partnerships
One of the
major principles of good professional early childhood practice is the image
teachers have of themselves as partners with the stakeholders involved in Early
Childhood Education and Care. Having
close relationships with parents, children, community and colleagues is
essential when maintaining professional relationships. Much research dictates
the importance of partnerships as privileged in all Early Childhood documents,
for example the Queensland Kindergarten Learning Guideline emphasise the
importance of partnerships through the ‘engaged parent.’ They state “Parents
play a vital role in fostering and sustaining children’s long-term learning and
development” (QSA, 2006). The National
Quality Standards emphasise the importance of relationships with children and
collaborative relationships with families and the community (ACECQA, 2011). They
affirm that relationships with children that are responsive, respectful and
promote children’s sense of security and belonging, give children the
opportunity to explore the environment and engage in play and learning (ACECQA,
2011). Furthermore, they believe collaborative relationships with families and
the importance of community partnerships based on active communication,
consultation and collaboration are fundamental to achieving quality outcomes
for children (ACECQA, 2011). These roles
and responsibilities to foster strong partnerships is fundamental.
Dilemma’s in
Early Childhood
"Play
provides opportunities for children to learn as they discover, create,
improvise and imagine” (Early Years Learning Framework, 2010)
By understanding all the constructs of childhood and seeing children as capable and competent learners, educators have the capacity to lead children into the future. Strong leadership must prevail in advocating for the concept of 'the environment as the third teacher' and the notion that children learn best when they are able to interact with their environment. Managing diversity and celebrating differences by maintaining strong relationships with all stakeholders will see Learning Managers commanding successful learning in inclusive classrooms. With the role and responsibilities of educators being met with increasing challenges, strategies to deal with ethical dilemmas and professionalism within the classroom as well as effecting appropriate pedagogy and insuring relevance in implementing curriculum are fundamental to success. Throughout this philosophy many personal views and beliefs have been explored. The way I see myself as a future Learning Manager for Early Childhood revolves about my role as an initiator of informative lessons in a stimulating, engaging, protective and professional atmosphere.
References
Asian Development Bank (2009). Good practice in information
and communication \technology for education. Retrieved fromhttp://www.adb.org/Documents/Guidelines/Good-Practice-Education-Training/Good-Practice-Education-Training.pdf
Australian Children’s Education and
Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2011). National quality standards . retrieved from
http://www.acecqa.gov.au/national-quality-framework/national-quality-standard/
Bartolomé, L (2004) Critical Pedagogy and Teacher Education: Radicalizing Prospective Teachers. Retrieved from
Ceci, S. (2006). Urie Bronfenbrenner (1917-2005) Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&hid=20&sid=4aa986be-f4cd-404f-94ce-dbc08d7b848f%40sessionmgr10
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2011)My time, our place: Framework for School Age Care in Australia http://www.deewr.gov.au/Earlychildhood/Policy_Agenda/Documents/AgeCareinAus.pdf
Early Childhood Australia (2006). Code
of Ethics. Retrieved from http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/code_of_ethics/early_childhood_australias_code_of_ethics.html#part_vii
Groundwater-Smith
(2011). Teaching
Challenges and Dilemmas (4th
Edition 2011). Australia: Cengage Learning Australia Pty Ltd.
Hyde,
M., Carpenter, L. & Conway, R. (2010). Inclusive education: The way to the
future. In
Hyde, M., Carpenter, L. & Conway,
R (Eds.), Diversity and inclusion in Australian schools (p. 337). South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University
Press.
Hughes, P.
& MacEwan, G. (n.d). Let the children play: Natures answer to early
learning. Retrieved from http://www.ccl-cca.ca/pdfs/ECLKC/lessons/Originalversion_LessonsinLearning.pdf
Jensen, D.
(2010). Parental Perspectives of Play with Preschool Children. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=honors&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.au
Katz, L.G.
(1987). What should young children be learning? Champaign, IL: ERIC
Clearinghouse on Early Childhood Education. ED 279407.
Kearsley
& Schneiderman, (1999). The engagement theory.
Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/nau.edu/educationallearningtheories/home/engagementtheory
Leonard, M. (2005). Children, Childhood and Social
Capital: Exploring the Links. Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/media-lab/426/kiddie%20cultural%20capital.pdf
McInerney, D & Mclnerney, V
(2006). Educational psychology: Constructing Learning. French’s Forest. Pearson
Prentice Hall, Chapter 10, pp. 348-373. Retrieved from http://library-resources.cqu.edu.au/cro/protected/eded11356/eded11356_cro2571_1.pdf
Newman, L., & Pollnitz, L. (2002).
Ethics in action: Introducing the ethical response cycle (pp. 1-18). Watson, ACT: Australian Early Childhood
Association. Retrieved from CQUniversity Course Resources Online EDED11404http://libraryresources.cqu.edu.au/cro/protected/eded11404/eded11404_cro4679.pdf
O’Brien,
T., & Guiney, D (2001). Differentiation in Teaching and Learning: principles
and
practice.
Teaching or learning: Intimate or distant. Cromwell Press. Retrieved from CQUniversity e-courses, EDED11400
Managing Diversity,
http://library-resources.cqu.edu.au/cro/protected/eded11400/eded11400_cro2828.pdf
Page, J. M. (2000). Reframing the early childhood curriculum: Educational imperatives for the future. London: Routledge Falmer.
Sorin, R. &
Galloway, G. (2006). Constructs of childhood: Constructs of self. Children Australia, 31(2), 12-21.
Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age.
Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
The
Learning Place (2011). Gifted education- understanding giftedness: characteristics.
Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/publication/production/reports/pdfs/giftedandtalfwrk.pdf
United Nations International Children's Emergency
Fund (UNICEF). (1989).
Fact Sheet: A summary of the rights
under the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/crc/files/Rights_overview.pdf
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment
Authority (VCAA). (2008). Analysis of curriculum/learning
frameworks for the early years. Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Earlychildhood/Policy_Agenda/EarlyChildhoodWorkforce/Docum ents/AnalysisofCurriculum_LearningFrameworksfortheEarly.pdf